Why are therapy lights so expensive?

Last Updated: 01.07.2025 03:37

Why are therapy lights so expensive?

Hope this helps others :)

Pros:

Number of lights (bulb: 12, Omniluxe 60)

New model helps to figure out which distant planets may host life - Space

3-year warranty, 60-day satisfaction guarantee

Comes with a cord attached so it’s basically its own complete lamp when you buy the stand

Comes with eye guards

Security Camera Footage Reveals How Dog Puts Away His Toys After Playing - AOL.com

Hooga is a reputable Red Light seller

Cons:

After a ton of research, I decided to buy the “Hooga HG24 bulb” with the cord and I also purchased a stand separately. Grand total: $60.

Team of the Matchday: Tani carries Minnesota, Joveljić sparks Sporting KC - MLSsoccer.com

Slightly less convenient for facial use since it doesn’t conform to your face and you have to be somewhat stationary with the bulb.

It’s AFFORDABLE at just $40 for the bulb+cord+power switch itself

You can shine the bulb anywhere on your body (beauty-specific masks are limiting). I’ll be treating my face as well as my alopecia areata on the top of my head.

What advice would you give to a father of a teenage daughter on how to protect her from boys, dating, and social media? How should fathers discuss these topics with their daughters?

I’ve been in the market for a red light therapy device and, like many of you, I’m dismayed by the pricing on every product that’s actually legitimate.

Yes, there’s a huge difference in total number of LEDs, but to put it in context, the Solawave has about five and this bulb has 12. The ones on this bulb are BIG. It casts light on my entire face when I’m up close.

It has its pros and cons but the pros vastly outweigh the cons in my opinion…

UFC Atlanta predictions - MMA Fighting

It has the very close technical specifications to the Omniluxe (Bulb 650 nm 850 ni, Omniluxe 630 nm 830 ni) MINUS the number of lights

It’s approved by the FDA as level II medical device (reminder, this means the FDA endorses it as safe, not that they are vouching for its efficacy)